STRASMORE/EXPLORE 2,433 QUERIES

Gain needed to get back to even after a loss

Answered against 22 years of US equities and 12 years of US options data and published with the query that produced it. This result is stored as of 2026-09-12, from The 7% Sell Rule Explained: O'Neil's Stop-Loss.

as of ranking 6×3read in context →
Gain needed to get back to even after a loss — 6 rows by 3 columns, computed from US exchange, SIP and OPRA data.
lossloss_pctgain_needed_pct
7%77.5
10%1011.1
20%2025
33.3%33.349.9
50%50100
75%75300
Rows × columns
6 × 3
Computed
Completeness
No missing values
Source
US exchange, SIP and OPRA market data
Licence
Strasmore terms · free, no signup
Formats
JSON · CSV · the SQL below

What each column holds

Column definitions for Gain needed to get back to even after a loss, derived from the stored result.
ColumnTypeRangeNotes
loss text 6 distinct values (10%, 20%, 33.3%…)
loss_pct number 7 to 75 percent
gain_needed_pct number 7.5 to 300 percent

Computed from Strasmore's warehouse of US exchange, SIP and OPRA market data. Equity prices are delayed; options greeks and implied volatility are end-of-day. This result is stored, not recomputed on load — it is exactly the numbers that were returned on , and the query below is what returned them.

Run it yourself

This is the exact query behind the result above. Change a ticker, a date or a column and run it against the warehouse — no account, no key. The no-signup tier is smaller than the one this page was computed on; a query that reaches past it comes back saying which plan runs it.

SELECT
    concat(toString(round(loss_pct, 1)), '%') AS loss,
    round(loss_pct, 1) AS loss_pct,
    round(100 * loss_pct / (100 - loss_pct), 1) AS gain_needed_pct
FROM
(
    SELECT arrayJoin([7, 10, 20, 100 / 3, 50, 75]) AS loss_pct
)
ORDER BY loss_pct
⌘/Ctrl + Enter
More from this analysisThe 7% Sell Rule Explained: O'Neil's Stop-Loss
Position size allowed by a $500 risk budget at each stop distance ranking 3×2 One decade of S&P 500 daily returns compounded at eight fixed bet sizes: ending wealth and worst drawdown ranking 8×3 Worst five-session stretch and deepest in-window drawdown, July 2025 to June 2026 ranking 7×4 One 10% risk budget, six names, six different weights ranking 6×4 Sessions that gapped through a 2% stop, and whether the limit price traded ranking 5×3 How often each stock opened below the prior close ranking 5×3 See all 2,433 queries →