STRASMORE/EXPLORE 3,094 QUERIES

Odd lots versus round lots in one AAPL session: prints and shares

Answered against 22 years of US equities and 12 years of US options data and published with the query that produced it. This result is stored as of 2026-10-05, from Why a Limit Order Didn't Fill: 5 Causes.

as of ranking 5×4read in context →
Odd lots versus round lots in one AAPL session: prints and shares — 5 rows by 4 columns, computed from US exchange, SIP and OPRA data.
trade_size_bucketprintspct_of_printspct_of_shares
1 to 99 (odd lot)61867893.345.3
100 to 499409366.227.4
500 to 99921090.35.7
1,000 to 9,99911860.29.1
10,000 and up26012.4
Rows × columns
5 × 4
Computed
Completeness
No missing values
Source
US exchange, SIP and OPRA market data
Licence
Strasmore terms · free, no signup
Formats
JSON · CSV · the SQL below

What each column holds

Column definitions for Odd lots versus round lots in one AAPL session: prints and shares, derived from the stored result.
ColumnTypeRangeNotes
trade_size_bucket text 5 distinct values
prints number 26 to 618,678
pct_of_prints number 0 to 93.3 percent
pct_of_shares number 5.7 to 45.3 percent

Computed from Strasmore's warehouse of US exchange, SIP and OPRA market data. Equity prices are delayed; options greeks and implied volatility are end-of-day. This result is stored, not recomputed on load — it is exactly the numbers that were returned on , and the query below is what returned them.

Run it yourself

This is the exact query behind the result above. Change a ticker, a date or a column and run it against the warehouse — no account, no key. The no-signup tier is smaller than the one this page was computed on; a query that reaches past it comes back saying which plan runs it.

SELECT
    bucket                                       AS trade_size_bucket,
    prints,
    round(100 * prints / sum(prints) OVER (), 1) AS pct_of_prints,
    round(100 * shares / sum(shares) OVER (), 1) AS pct_of_shares
FROM
(
    SELECT
        multiIf(size < 100,   '1 to 99 (odd lot)',
                size < 500,   '100 to 499',
                size < 1000,  '500 to 999',
                size < 10000, '1,000 to 9,999',
                              '10,000 and up') AS bucket,
        count()                                AS prints,
        sum(size)                              AS shares
    FROM global_markets.stocks_trades
    WHERE ticker = 'AAPL'
      AND sip_timestamp >= '2026-09-15 00:00:00'
      AND sip_timestamp <  '2026-09-16 00:00:00'
      AND (toHour(toTimeZone(sip_timestamp, 'America/New_York')) * 60
           + toMinute(toTimeZone(sip_timestamp, 'America/New_York'))) >= 570
      AND (toHour(toTimeZone(sip_timestamp, 'America/New_York')) * 60
           + toMinute(toTimeZone(sip_timestamp, 'America/New_York'))) < 960
    GROUP BY bucket
)
ORDER BY indexOf(['1 to 99 (odd lot)', '100 to 499', '500 to 999', '1,000 to 9,999', '10,000 and up'], trade_size_bucket)
⌘/Ctrl + Enter

Work with this data in your AI assistant

Opens ready to query, with this page's data. Free, no account.

More from this analysisWhy a Limit Order Didn't Fill: 5 Causes
Where one session of AAPL prints actually happened, by venue ranking 15×4 → Shares traded at KO's lowest price levels in one session ranking 8×3 → Minutes a session spends near its own low, five household names series 5×4 → Average gap between tape prints, regular session, Sep 15 2026 ranking 6×3 → How often a resting limit was reached, by distance from the prior close (SPY, 2021 to Sep 2026) ranking 6×3 → A 1% buy limit vs a 1% sell limit: share of SPY sessions reached, by year ranking 6×3 → See all 3,094 queries →